Why FoodBank Manager Uses Private Databases
FoodBank Manager (FBM) is built around a privacy-first design. One of the most important parts of that design is the use of private, agency-specific databases.
Instead of using a single shared database where every agency’s client data is stored together, FBM provides each partner agency with its own private database. This allows for local ownership, stronger privacy, and a clearer audit trail.
What is a private database?
In FBM, each agency has its own separate data environment. That means your guest records, visit history, and notes are only accessible to your agency (and to the food bank, if granted permission). No other partner agencies can access your data unless you choose to share it.
Why does this matter?
Agencies retain ownership and control over their data
Clients are protected from accidental data exposure across agencies
Data requests and audits are easier to trace to a single agency
Supports agencies serving undocumented or high-risk populations
How is this different from a shared database?
In a shared system, multiple agencies write to the same database — often using a single shared guest ID. This can lead to:
Confusion about who added or changed a record
Conflicts over ownership of guest data
Risk of exposing sensitive records to unauthorized agencies
FBM’s model avoids these risks by keeping agency records fully separated.
Can data still be reported regionally?
Yes. FBM uses a data lake model to aggregate reports from across the network. Each agency’s data is depersonalized before being added to the food bank’s reporting view. This allows food banks to see big-picture statistics and unduplicated household counts without compromising local privacy.
Summary
FBM gives each agency its own private database
Private databases enhance privacy, control, and traceability
Regional reporting is still possible using depersonalized data
Need help understanding database structure or data access settings?
[Submit a support ticket →]
Was this article helpful?
That’s Great!
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry! We couldn't be helpful
Thank you for your feedback
Feedback sent
We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article